By Karl Prosser on
1/3/2009 7:14 PM
PowerShell CTP3 ISE - Integrated Scripting environment has inherited many ideas and features from PowerShell analyzer including multiple runspaces,editors, a smaller immediate input area and output pane, however it doesn’t have the output visualizers of PSA nor the super fast RTS like execution control of PSA.
However Microsoft in their wisdom has made ISE rather extensible through the $PSISE variable, and many people already have added some very cool functionality to ISE through these.
When I first demo’d what was then MSH analyzer to Microsoft back in the first few months of 2006, the feature that seemed to stand out the most to the team was the ability to select an area of code and just run that. Thankfully that level of execution control is now in ISE as F6, but I wanted more, so i’m going to share with you a script that build a few months ago to add a couple of features.
F7 run the current physical line.
Read More »
|
By Karl Prosser on
12/19/2008 4:58 PM
SURVEY: http://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?key=pgTpVBomNgDwUA9uQNRKAbw&hl=en
Taking an app from an internal application to a shrink-wrap ready for
the masses state is a lot of work, and updating/supporting/marketting
a product even more so. So after the huge sucess of PowerShell Plus
which is now safe in Idera's hands we need your help to decide what we
are going to release next. We plan to release some free projects, even
some opensource apps, but will likely look at productizing a project
so we can continue to feed our families. Please take the time to take
our survey
Read More »
|
By Marco Shaw on
6/27/2008 4:52 AM
PowerShell Usability Study, July 22 to July 29, 2008 at Redmond, WA
Read More »
|
By Karl Prosser on
6/17/2008 9:15 PM
So I've loved portable apps from time memorial and have valued making my own apps as portable as possible - XCOPY friendly.
|
By Karl Prosser on
6/17/2008 9:12 PM
Given the context on the last few posts. I've made a simple helper method in C# that can take a simple powershell hashtable and create a PSCustomObject based on it. Here is an example of how you can call it.
Read More »
|
By Karl Prosser on
6/17/2008 9:08 PM
Based on the performance testing and work being done by myself , mow , Brandon Shell and others the question has come up what is the quickest way to generate a PSCustomObject, whether in script , on in C#, and how do you even do it in C#?
Some typical ways of doing in PowerShell have been either something like the following trick:
Read More »
|
By Karl Prosser on
6/11/2008 9:23 PM
I've spend a lot of time in the past looking at the performance of PowerShell but have never gotten around to blogging about it. However it has become quite a hot button among MVPs and others in recent days and we've been busy testing and comparing the speeds different techniques in PowerShell in both V1 and V2.
In V1 there seems to be extreme slowdowns when invoking cmdlet, functions, any type of scriptblock and when using the pipeline. If you...
Read More »
|
By Karl Prosser on
6/7/2008 12:32 AM
One thing that has bothered me about true cmdlets in contrast scripts is that they lived in SnapIns and couldn't be deployed with xcopy as scripts can because SnapIns required Registration/Installation. I build my own way to deal with this need some time ago, and thought that I'd start a blog series covering it. I call them Snapininis or SnapIn-Lites. A good thing is you can achieve the same end result in PowerShell V2 with modules - but that is V2 and a while away from being released, and then even further away from being fully deployed.
Read More »
|
By Karl Prosser on
6/3/2008 10:40 PM
Many people recently have asked how to determine programatically what version of PowerShell their script is running in. Well in version two there is a $psversiontable variable, but this sadly isn't in V1. All is not lost though, as you can write a simple function to return a version object for v1. Below is a quick function that I wrote that I have been using for the last year or so.
Read More »
|
By Don Jones on
6/2/2008 8:01 AM
Here's my hands-on review of the Amazon Kindle, along with a chance for you to win your own!
Read More »
|